<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linux etc. &#187; Gmail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://promberger.info/linux/category/gmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://promberger.info/linux</link>
	<description>my outsourced memory for your perusal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Gmail sucks</title>
		<link>http://promberger.info/linux/2009/06/11/why-gmail-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://promberger.info/linux/2009/06/11/why-gmail-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promberger.info/linux/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that anyone cares, but it helps to vent. This post is continually updated whenever I feel like it. Why do I use Gmail if it sucks? I use it only as a storage container for mailing lists that I don&#8217;t read daily, and I read that mail using mutt via IMAP (more precisely, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that anyone cares, but it helps to vent. This post is continually updated whenever I feel like it.</p>
<p>Why do I use Gmail if it sucks? I use it only as a storage container for mailing lists that I don&#8217;t read daily, and I read that mail using <a href="http://www.mutt.org/">mutt</a> via IMAP (more precisely, I read responsive local maildirs that get synchronized by the wonderful <a href="http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlineimap">OfflineIMAP</a>). Unfortunately, some people see my Gmail account and use it to send me mail directly, so I have to deal with these mails somehow. </p>
<p>Gmail is also great for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_messaging">IM</a>&#8216;ing with people using the open standard <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmpp">XMPP</a> protocol, which is what Gmail uses for its chat feature. People won&#8217;t understand they can add my other XMPP account to their Gmail chat, but they understand how to add a Gmail address, even though it&#8217;s no different. In their favor, I&#8217;ve also found Gmail&#8217;s XMPP server to be very reliable, and it doesn&#8217;t kick you off for being logged on from multiple locations.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the list:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>No wildcard search.</strong> Try searching without wildcards in a language like German, which uses inflection much more than English and infamously contains many compound nouns. This alone makes Gmail unusable for me.</li>
<li><strong>Cannot apply filters in a certain order.</strong> So it isn&#8217;t possible to apply one rule to all mails that didn&#8217;t match any of the previous filters. Sure, procmail is unintuitive like hell, but at least you can read up on it and then it really does what you want it to do.</li>
<li><strong>Cannot display individual messages</strong> on their own or <strong>sort mail</strong>, e.g. by sender.</li>
<li>I regularly have lots of false positives in the spam folder. Most of them are from mailing lists that also match a rule that labels them and moves them out of the inbox. When I manually click &#8220;Not spam&#8221; in the spam folder, they get labeled correctly, but then <strong>moved to the inbox</strong>. So I have to manually remove them from the inbox. And in the inbox, there isn&#8217;t even a way to quickly mark all messages that have any label, no matter which one! (In mutt, I would just have to type <code>T ~y .</code> and hit &#8220;Enter&#8221;)</li>
<li>Did I mention I have <strong>lots of false positives</strong> in spam, and no way to set the <strong>threshold</strong>?</li>
<li><strong>Filter rules are really limited</strong> in what you can do with them, and the standard filter setup form doesn&#8217;t even have the option to filter by &#8220;cc&#8221;, or to choose between Boolean operators. (you can do this by putting something like <code>to:this.address@blah.com OR cc:this.address@blah.com</code> into the &#8220;Has the words&#8221; field.)</li>
<li><i>Aug 16 edit:</i> Recently, Gmail automatically added some labels like &#8220;Travel&#8221;, &#8220;Personal&#8221;, &#8220;Receipts&#8221; for users who had no labels. Maybe those users wanted no labels? Maybe some of them are like my parents, for whom I&#8217;ve set up Gmail accounts, but who normally access them using Thunderbird, and who might be confused by things suddenly appearing when they do use the webmail interface, like when they&#8217;re traveling? Even worse when these extra labels bump the not-so-unimportant labels of &#8220;All Mail&#8221;, &#8220;Trash&#8221;, and &#8220;Spam&#8221; out of view.</li>
</ol>
<p>Gmail is probably pretty cool if all you were using before was a very limited webmail interface. Do yourself a favor and try a decent desktop mail client, like Thunderbird. If you want your mail to be available online, you can still use that client to read Gmail via IMAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://promberger.info/linux/2009/06/11/why-gmail-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to delete more than 20 Gmail contacts</title>
		<link>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/how-to-delete-more-than-20-gmail-contacts/</link>
		<comments>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/how-to-delete-more-than-20-gmail-contacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/how-to-delete-more-than-20-gmail-contacts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you select more than 20 of your contacts in Gmail and click on &#8220;delete&#8221;, Gmail complains that it cannot delete more than 20 contacts at once. Here&#8217;s how you can delete all of your contacts at once anyway: While logged in to your Gmail account, in the top right corner, you will see a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you select more than 20 of your contacts in Gmail and click on &#8220;delete&#8221;, Gmail complains that it cannot delete more than 20 contacts at once. Here&#8217;s how you can delete all of your contacts at once anyway: </p>
<p>While logged in to your Gmail account, in the top right corner, you will see a link &#8220;Older version&#8221; (next to Settings). Click that. Go to your contacts page. Scroll down, select all, delete.</p>
<p>I think the fact that you cannot delete more than 20 contacts in the newer version, along with not being able to turn off the &#8220;feature&#8221; that anyone you reply to is added to your contacts, is one of the first signs that Google is indeed starting to be evil. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/how-to-delete-more-than-20-gmail-contacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail&#8217;s bad encryption defaults</title>
		<link>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/gmails-bad-encryption-defaults/</link>
		<comments>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/gmails-bad-encryption-defaults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/gmails-bad-encryption-defaults/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gmail&#8217;s webmail service unfortunately defaults to the following behavior: Your login is encrypted, but the page reverts back to unencrypted http after you&#8217;re logged in. If you&#8217;re in an unprotected wireless network, such as a public hotspot, not only can the e-mails you read and compose be easily read by anyone else on that network, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail&#8217;s webmail service unfortunately defaults to the following behavior: Your login is encrypted, but the page reverts back to unencrypted http after you&#8217;re logged in. If you&#8217;re in an unprotected wireless network, such as a public hotspot, not only can the e-mails you read and compose be easily read by anyone else on that network, someone can actually <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33207/108/">hijack your Gmail account</a> that way. </p>
<p><img src="http://promberger.info/files/gmail_url.jpg" alt="Gmail's unsecured default URL" style="margin: 1em 0; border: 1px solid grey;"> </p>
<p>The fix is easy if you&#8217;re a little computer-savvy: manually put in the URL <code>https://mail.google.com</code> (note the &#8220;s&#8221; in &#8220;https://&#8221;, and your entire session will be encrypted via SSL. This also works for <code>https://gmail.com</code>, although Firefox will complain about a domain name mismatch.  Fine so far. However, if you use yet another URL alias for Gmail, <code>https://googlemail.com</code>, the trick doesn&#8217;t work: your Gmail connection now reverts back to unencrypted after login. </p>
<p><span id="more-111"></span><br />
I don&#8217;t understand why Gmail doesn&#8217;t make SSL encryption for the entire session the default. Yes, you can bookmark the secure URL, but if you&#8217;re travelling you may well not be on your own computer. And less tech-savvy users like my parents will have to remember to use a special URL instead of being able to just click on the &#8220;Mail&#8221; link on a Google page. I find Gmail&#8217;s choice especially surprising given that in other respects they take the laudable approach of helping out the less knowledgeable user, such as with this alert I found today for a phishing e-mail in my spam folder:</p>
<div style="overflow:auto; margin: 1em 0; border: 1px solid grey;">
<img src="http://promberger.info/files/gmail_phish.jpg" alt="Gmail warning for a phishing mail"></div>
<h3>Addendum</h3>
<p>Gmail has recently added an option for this in the settings (&#8220;General Settings&#8221;). It&#8217;s at the very bottom. You can click to select &#8220;Always use https&#8221;, and Gmail will default to the secure connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/05/01/gmails-bad-encryption-defaults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting Word documents to pdf via Google docs (&amp; Gmail)</title>
		<link>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/04/15/converting-word-documents-to-pdf-via-google-docs-gmail/</link>
		<comments>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/04/15/converting-word-documents-to-pdf-via-google-docs-gmail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promberger.info/linux/2008/04/15/converting-word-documents-to-pdf-via-google-docs-gmail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you receive a Word .doc file as an e-mail attachment to your Gmail account, you can view it as a Google doc. From Google docs, you can print it, and printing actually creates a pdf file for you to view or download. Neat. (Obviously, it would be even neater not to receive .doc files [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you receive a Word .doc file as an e-mail attachment to your Gmail<br />
account, you can view it as a Google doc. From Google docs, you can<br />
print it, and printing actually creates a pdf file for you to view or<br />
download. Neat. (Obviously, it would be even neater not to receive .doc<br />
files in the first place). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://promberger.info/linux/2008/04/15/converting-word-documents-to-pdf-via-google-docs-gmail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

